Hearing two: He who asserts must prove.
Within this sob story are many facts. Some of them
are arguably fictitious, real or simply assertions, key word being arguably.
I believe any case is based on that; the fact that a
party is simply “claiming” things. Whether it is true or not is immaterial
right? The standard of right and wrong in a court room more often than not, is
that everlasting standard set by “the law”. You just have to prove that law
fits into whatever you are saying. I guess in this world, that is what the wins
cases.
I lost this case even before I started arguing as
its construction is assertion. This ties me to a peculiar legal premise and one
alone: he, who asserts must prove.
It is a well-known legal principle that he who
asserts must prove. Assertions are not always necessarily true, or necessarily
founded on what is believed to be proof, as I have said. I claim they are
simply theories with seconded opinions in agreement; agreement being then what
is commonly known as the “proof.”
Indulge the simple interpretation of this principle
in this special context.
It was more of a deceleration. It was, having these
assertions that could in this instance be synonymous with beliefs and dreams, to
having others in reaction to the thought that the former for some reason were
misguided.*shrug*
I was finally the young grown up; the unfolding
adult and I found it exciting for some strange reason. It’s at this particular
juvenile stage that teens feel they have the liberty to exercise every right in
them “inherently.”
While I contend I was also part of this
metamorphosis I am seemingly cynical about, my sarcasm can be construed
broadly. I thus beg to clear all possible doubt by direction to this fairly
restrictive two pronged interpretation.
I was a dreamer. I believed in some sort of construction
of love that with every day is being dismantled and re-arranged.
I loved and hated that about myself.
The bigger question being posed now: “am I still one?”
I believed in everything else too. Bands and tours,
valedictorian speeches and awards, gothic and metallic rock experiences,
vampire fiction indulgences- name it. I believed in all these things for
myself. As that phase unfolded, I was to learn that dreaming that dreams may
come true, may in most aspects be futile.
This is why. Sometimes the point of dreaming is to
help you hope, and in hoping, live. Hope; it is the motion. It makes the blood change
courses.
It is what keeps you wanting to wake up the next
day, and grab the nearest pen and writable surface to jot down ideals and
theories that are mostly songs and production ideas, even in the most absurd
places and during the most inappropriate situations.
Hope kept me believing that someday, my everlasting
subjection to boarding school would end and I would finally be able to “live.” I
would be able to fall in love and go on those tours I played in my mind. That
is something among many other things, that God used to curb my impatience and
over enthusiastic tendencies. It is also a tool God used to enable me know him
more, at that time.
As I
mentioned, I believed in love. While it can be said that in the application of
the objective reasonable man test, everyone does believe in love, I beg to
state that mine was a special kind. Yes it involved the clichés; the knights in
shining amours on white horses, with blonde hair, that were princes in some
far, far away kingdom but also included
the requirements for a, colloquially speaking “hot” guy. But it was established
essentially on the desire for a man that loved God more than he would ever love
me. That hasn’t changed and I pray will never.
So here is what happened: cute guy in blue shirt
comes on an outreach plan to minister, in which and during which ministry there
is the happening of “a moment” between him and I. Personal deduction and
holding?-dream coming true. I was but a child really.
That Sunday all we did was exchange Facebook names.
At that time my parents were of the view that I didn’t need to have a mobile
phone. Little did I know that the little grace that was to be accorded to me in
having one in the time to come, would be relinquished from fraternizing with
this one John Tucker. Nevertheless, the following day in my most treasured
computer class, I was in exercise of the privilege given to me once a week.
That is; the use of the most popular social media in my circles and among my
peers at that time, known as Facebook. The main point was to check for
messages, see notifications and chat with someone online if you had the time
to. As the lesson went on, I got to the part where I had time to chat and lo
and behold, it was John Tucker sending me the first message. His name has a lot
to do with this particular situation. The subject matter of our conversation
was mostly awkward and thus entertaining to my friends that were with me to see
those messages. I know I had said that I was apathetic to the whole situation
of meeting him, and him showering me with praises over my less than amateur
playing but in truth, however much I am embarrassed to admit a few things
specific to my sex, we love attention. I hate that I love it. So I try not to
dwell on it most of the time.
Like now. Moving on swifly.
This point is to explain that while I enjoyed the
whole unfolding of this typical boy- meets- girl story, I also awarded it the
clichés it deserved. Take this very parallel instance for one.
Teenage girl, who is into rock music and wants to be
unique blablabla, meets random guy who she thinks is too good to be true. In one way she is right, in other’s she is
not, but at that time, to her he is just another John Tucker like guy.
The substance of that Facebook conversation wasn’t
even vouching for dissuasion to my cliché conclusion. So I made it up in my
mind that he was such. A typical John Tucker bent on entertaining himself with
pursuits of conquest; subjects being random 15 year old girls who suck at
playing the piano. And that ended that. Category named and file saved in mind.
The point I am really making to myself is that for example,
while I pretended I didn’t believe in this dream, I did. But it was not to be.
The song “Dear John” By Taylor Swift was etched into
my ka mind for a while. When I was fifteen, the song “Fifteen” by Taylor Swift
was etched in my mind as well. But from all these chart toppers I have learnt
that a cut and a broken heart are two significantly different things I have to
say. That Taylor Swift chic used to be deep.
I was a little girl then when that all started, but
now I’m an older little girl. I don’t want to go into the details of what that
was all about because it’s always re-lived. The most I can go to explaining it,
is in the feeling of having dapple gangers; me multiplied- so many “me’s” with
different amplifications that make me, them.
That kind of pain can do a lot, but in the end it’s
you to choose to deal with the pain in the right way. The effects of pain are
not chains, they are a chair you can choose to sit in, or burn.
So the main question, is do I still believe in this
whole love dream? The answer is yes and no. While love can be many things, what
I dispute is the picture I have of it now that still little girl has grown up.
I don’t
believe that love is a Knight in shining armor on a white horse, neither do I
believe that it’s chocolate and roses and poems and mush, even while it can be
these things. It’s something much more mature and complex.
It’s not the color pink, its red. It’s not blue,
it’s black. It’s the most complicated thing I know. It’s the most beautiful
thing I know. To love someone and be loved is something Coldplay called
“Magic.” I contend. It’s something divine and of God, for he is the essence of
love. To be in excruciating pain your heart feels like its contracting, and
still choose to cherish memories that only put salt in the wound must say
something.
When you love someone, you love them- No matter
what. That’s the biggest glitch in any escape plan, and the lynch pin in the
beauty of love.
But for me I am on some other plan. The loving God
plan. Don’t laugh. I’m so for real. I just also realize that I do not entirely
comprehend love. Go know its source to truly live it out right?
I assert all these things about love. But I have to
prove them as is the legal principle.
So in the words of the band US#,
“No
one can choose who they fall for, or when they fall, or how they fall or why.
But no, I don’t fall in love, it’s much too complicated.”
No comments:
Post a Comment